That’s how the whole “moral majority” looks to me.

How else could we discover untold delights resident beyond our searching?

A top down to go with that bottoms up, on me !-)

Here’s my favorite description, from The Sixteenth Year (A.D. 10) in The Urantia Book:
“He was a virile and comely youth. He became increasingly sober and serious, but he was kind and sympathetic. His eye was kind but searching; his smile was always engaging and reassuring.
“His voice was musical but authoritative; his greeting cordial but unaffected. Always, even in the most commonplace of contacts, there seemed to be in evidence the touch of a twofold nature, the human and the divine. Ever he displayed this combination of the sympathizing friend and the authoritative teacher. And these personality traits began early to become manifest, even in these adolescent years.
“This physically strong and robust youth also acquired the full growth of his human intellect, not the full experience of human thinking but the fullness of capacity for such intellectual development. He possessed a healthy and well-proportioned body, a keen and analytical mind, a kind and sympathetic disposition, a somewhat fluctuating but aggressive temperament, all of which were becoming organized into a strong, striking, and attractive personality.”

Now that’s what I’m talkin’ ’bout.

Dude, he was a heart breaker, remember. He messed Rebecca up for her entire life. “Jesus was a splendid specimen of robust and intellectual manhood.” Huzzah, huzzah huzzah.

Of course he’s hot, nonnie, he’s a fine Jewish boy from a vonderful family. 😎

The pictures of Jesus have been most unfortunate. These paintings of the Christ have exerted a deleterious influence on youth; the temple merchants would hardly have fled before Jesus if he had been such a man as your artists usually have depicted. His was a dignified manhood; he was good, but natural. Jesus did not pose as a mild, sweet, gentle, and kindly mystic.