McCain-Palin: Authoritarians

“The greatest threat to American democracy today arises from a militant authoritarianism that has become a cancer upon the nation.”

So says psychology professor Robert Altemeyer, who provided Wateregate whistle-blower John Dean with forty years of study on the authoritarian personality type that roughly 28 percent of Americans proudly call their modus operandi.

John Dean:

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican candidates, have shown themselves to be unapologetic and archetypical authoritarian conservatives. Indeed, their campaign has warmed the hearts of fellow authoritarians, who applaud them for their negativity, nastiness, and dishonest ploys, and only criticize them for not offering more of the same.

The McCain/Palin campaign has assumed a typical authoritarian posture: The candidates provide no true, specific proposals to address America’s needs. Rather, they simply ask voters to “trust us” and suggest that their opponents – Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden – are not “real Americans” like McCain, Palin, and the voters they are seeking to court. Accordingly, McCain and Plain have called Obama “a socialist,” “a redistributionist,” “a Marxist,” and “a communist” – without a shred of evidence to support their name-calling, for these terms are pejorative, rather than in any manner descriptive. This is the way authoritarian leaders operate.

In my book Conservatives Without Conscience, I set forth the traits of authoritarian leaders and followers, which have been distilled from a half-century of empirical research, during which thousands of people have voluntarily been interviewed by social scientists. The touch points in these somewhat-overlapping lists of character traits provide a clear picture of the characters of both John McCain and Sarah Palin.

McCain, especially, fits perfectly as an authoritarian leader. Such leaders possess most, if not all, of these traits:

* dominating

* opposes equality

* desirous of personal power

* amoral

* intimidating and bullying

* faintly hedonistic

* vengeful

* pitiless

* exploitive

* manipulative

* dishonest

* cheats to win

* highly prejudiced (racist, sexist, homophobic)

* mean-spirited

* militant

* nationalistic

* tells others what they want to hear

* takes advantage of “suckers”

* specializes in creating false images to sell self

* may or may not be religious

* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

Incidentally, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney also can be described by these well-defined and typical traits — which is why a McCain presidency is so likely to be nearly identical to a Bush presidency.

Clearly, Sarah Palin also has some qualities typical of authoritarian leaders, not to mention almost all of the traits found among authoritarian followers. Specifically, such followers can be described as follows:

• submissive to authority

aggressive on behalf of authority

highly conventional in their behavior

highly religious*

possessing moderate to little education

trusting of untrustworthy authorities

prejudiced (particularly against homosexuals and followers of religions other than their own)







uncritical toward chosen authority


inconsistent and contradictory

prone to panic easily

highly self-righteous


strict disciplinarians

severely punitive

demanding loyalty and returning it

possessing little self-awareness

usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

*By “highly religious,” Dean means religious in the traditional, evolutionary religion sense; which must be distinguished with religious in the sense of spiritual understanding, which has little or nothing to do with religious affiliations.

The leading authority on right-wing authoritarianism, a man who devoted his career to developing hard empirical data about these people and their beliefs, is Robert Altemeyer. Altemeyer, a social scientist based in Canada, flushed out these typical character traits in decades of testing.

Altemeyer believes about 25 percent of the adult population in the United States is solidly authoritarian (with that group mostly composed of followers, and a small percentage of potential leaders). It is in these ranks of some 70 million that we find the core of the McCain/Palin supporters. They are people who are, in Altemeyer’s words, are “so self-righteous, so ill-informed, and so dogmatic that nothing you can say or do will change their minds.”

Hmm. Kind of mirrors the 28 percent that still think Dick Bush is doing a heckofa job.  Kind of sounds like John McCain’s “base” supporters; a wonderful double entendre.

If Obama is rejected on November 4th for another authoritarian conservative like McCain, I must ask if Americans are sufficiently intelligent to competently govern themselves.

And you will have already been answered.

I can understand authoritarian conservatives voting for McCain, for they [refuse to] know no better. It is well-understood that most everyone votes with his or her heart, not his or her head. Polls show that 81 percent of Americans “feel” (in their hearts and their heads) that our country is going the wrong way. How could anyone with such thoughts and feelings vote for more authoritarian conservatism, which has done so much to take the nation in the wrong direction?

I think Dean overlooks the fact that authoritarian McCaniacs think America is headed in the wrong direction because the others who feel we’re headed in the wrong direction support Obama, or anyone not espousing authoritarian Mavericky Shit-Pie that passes for the Republican Manifesto.

We will all find out on (or about) November 5th.

Perhaps. Or we could be headed for another vote fraud debacle that has McCain-Palin ahead by a few hundred votes nationally, and the Supremes get to pick another authoritarian asshole and his sidekick.

People like William Ayers— who considered himself a true patriot— will start blowing shit up again.


The Supremes do the right thing, and we can get on with excising the cancer from America’s heart and soul.


  1. Pingback: Today’s Quotes: Conservatives Without Conscience | Fishink

  2. Hi Terrie,
    The theft of another election would, IMO, break the back of this nation. As the turning point nears, it may be hard to discern the Most Highs acting, but we can be sure they are interposing the superior wisdom of the constellation rulers in the affairs of the kingdoms of men, as the over-controllers of our political evolution; fostering the “greatest good to the greatest number of all men and for the greatest length of time.”

    May their power strengthen us, and overshadow us.

    Thanks for your thoughts.

  3. Terrie of Nebadon

    The Daily Show with Jon Stewart (the best satire ever!) had Bill Kristol, apparently, a McCain supporter, right wing pundit from some pathetic main stream media. He mentioned (as a joke) that Tuesday nite would be “an upset”. I’ve heard it a few times lately and it is another ominous phrase meaning “stolen election”.

    Also, I have seen coverage on Democracy Now (the best news source ever!) and even on 20/20 regarding the voting machine troubles and the dienfranchising of voters (in Colorado too). So all is in place to steal the election yet again.

    But the other thing I’m noticing is that the pundits of the main stream media keep saying Obama is way ahead. I have a feeling that they aren’t going to get away with stealing the election this time and that those behind this travesty on this world (Caligastia et al) know they aren’t going to get away with it and are grasping at straws.

    I think Obama is going to be our next president and the tide is turning. Or the unthinkable could happen and……


Prove you're human: leave a comment.